SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER

A Framework for Improving Cross-Sector Coordination for Emergency Preparedness and Response

Return to Search Results

A Framework for Improving Cross-Sector Coordination for Emergency Preparedness and Response

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Bureau of Justice Assistance
  • 2008

“The CDC and the U.S. Department of Justice convened a Workgroup on Public Health and Law Enforcement Emergency Preparedness. “Between June 2007 and February 2008, the Workgroup members met to identify opportunities for improving cross-sectoral and cross-jurisdictional collaboration and to craft two other tools: a model Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for joint investigations of bioterrorism, and a guide for developing MOUs for strengthening coordinated, multi-sector responses to influenza pandemics and other infectious disease threats.” This report provides a framework for addressing and implementing disaster preparedness and response plans.”

This report is included in our list of TEN NOTABLE RESOURCES FOR CROSS-SECTOR APPROACHES TO INFECTIOUS DISEASE MANAGEMENT.

View Resource

Related Resources

  • Journal of Supply Chain Management
  • Jury Gualandris and Robert D. Klassen
  • 2018

✴︎ Available only with purchase from publisher “Governments and global corporations increasingly both confront and rely on international non‐governmental organizations (INGOs) to identify, design, and deliver interventions that prompt transformational change in societies, industries, and supply chains. For INGOs, transformational change is defined as a…

  • International Journal of Care and Caring
  • Carol Jacklin-Jarvis and Karen Potter
  • 2018

✴︎ Available only with purchase from publisher “Collaboration between the UK’s voluntary organisations and public agencies is often viewed through the lens of the changing welfare state. In this paper we contrast cross-sector collaboration in children’s services — as an example of the ‘welfare state’…

    Featured
  • SSIR
  • Jorrit De Jong, Amy Edmondson, Mark Moore, Hannah Riley Bowles, Jan Rivkin, Eva Flavia Martínez Orbegozo, and Santiago Pulido-Gomez
  • 2021

“The question of how to collaborate across boundaries admits no easy, universal answer. There are, however, striking similarities between the types of challenges that different collaborations face. From 2018 to 2020, the authors of this article—researchers from the Harvard Business School and the Harvard Kennedy…

  • Public Management Review
  • Sherena Hussain and Matti Siemiatycki
  • 2018

“Private capital has become a significant feature of infrastructure public-private partnerships (PPPs) on the premise that it incentivizes diligent risk management among private partners. This paper evaluates this claim by examining the PPP programme in Ontario, Canada, where the amount of long-term private capital in…

  • Public Administration
  • Eva Sørensen and Jacob Torfing
  • 2018

“Initially, governance networks were intended as tools for making public governance more effective. Yet, scholars have argued that governance networks also have the potential to democratize public governance. This article provides an overview of theoretical arguments pertaining to the democratizing impact of governance networks. It…

  • Urban Affairs Review
  • Amy Rosenthal and Kathe Newman
  • 2018

“The public-private food assistance system (PPFAS) emerged during the 1970s to address ‘emergency’ food needs and has since grown into a regularized social welfare system of grocery and meal provision and related program delivery, realized through the collective efforts of organizations and individuals. We explore…

  • Beeck Center for Social Impact + Innovation
  • Robert M. Groves and Adam Neufeld
  • 2017

“The public pays for and provides an incredible amount of data to governments and companies. Yet much of the value of this data is being wasted, remaining in silos rather than being shared to enhance the common good—whether it’s helping governments to stop opioid addiction…

  • Living Cities
  • Jennifer Mayer
  • 2017

“In our latest City Accelerator guide, ‘Resilience, Equity, and Innovation,’ we share the tools and processes four cities, Pittsburgh, Saint Paul, San Francisco and Washington D.C., explored in an effort to increase equity and fund infrastructure. With new approaches to managing public resources, these cities…

  • Stanford Social Innovation Review
  • Jeff Shumway, Jake Segal, and Michael Etzel
  • 2018

“It’s still early days for governments experimenting with pay-for-success (PFS) projects, in which governments ask private funders to foot the bill for social programs, and then agree to repay those funders if the programs achieve agreed-on results. As public budgets tighten and social challenges remain…