SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER
Logo Logo Logo Logo Logo
  • About
    • The Intersector Project
    • Newsroom
    • Contact
  • Toolkit
  • Cases
    • Cases
  • Research
    • Research Briefing
    • Research to Practice
    • Researcher Insights
    • Reports
    • Research Agenda
    • Questions to Understand a Cross-sector Collaboration
  • Resource Library
    • About The Resource Library
    • Resource Library
    • Topic-Specific Lists of Resources
  • Blog
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linkedin
  • Vimeo
  • About
    • The Intersector Project
    • Newsroom
    • Contact
  • Toolkit
  • Cases
    • Cases
  • Research
    • Research Briefing
    • Research to Practice
    • Researcher Insights
    • Reports
    • Research Agenda
    • Questions to Understand a Cross-sector Collaboration
  • Resource Library
    • About The Resource Library
    • Resource Library
    • Topic-Specific Lists of Resources
  • Blog
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linkedin
  • Vimeo

Dec 07 2015 A new tool allows cross-sector partners to self-assess the health of their collaboration

Posted at 17:55h in Uncategorized by The Intersector Project

blogimage_LivingCitiesIn the production of our own Toolkit, and through our evolving research projects and communication with other organizations in the cross-sector space, we’ve familiarized ourselves with a wide variety of tools and resources that aim to improve the practice of cross-sector collaboration (including most recently Spark Policy’s Data as a Tool for Change toolkit and the Partnering Agreement Scorecard from the Partnerships Resource Centre and The Partnering Initiative). There are many toolkits that support cross-sector collaboration planning processes and share best practices, but fewer freely available resources that focus on getting collaborative partners to discuss and reflect on the state of their own partnerships. With the release of their new Cross-Sector Partnership Assessment, Living Cities adds a valuable resource that is uniquely positioned to help current cross-sector practitioners self-assess the health of their collaboration.

Living Cities’ 10-minute online assessment provides collaborators with tailored feedback and links to resources based on their answers to several questions about the way they’re navigating their partnership. While individuals can take the Assessment, “we designed the tool to not only be useful for an individual user, but also for the partnership as a team,” explained Jeff Raderstrong, Program Associate for the Integration Initiative at Living Cities. “We developed a group planning and discussion guide to help cross-sector partnership participants to use the Assessment to collectively reflect on and analyze their partnership.” It’s key to build in structures that support improving partnerships as they evolve from the beginning of a collaboration, and the Assessment may prove to be helpful in this regard. According to Jeff, with the overwhelming nature of and responsibilities involved in cross-sector collaboration, leaders “need tools that can be easily integrated into the overall management of their cross-sector partnership.”

At The Intersector Project, we focus on the collaborative process instead of confining our research and resources to one topic or issue, as the tactics we present in our Toolkit, for example, can be applied across issue areas. The same can be said for the Cross-Sector Partnership Assessment: “We … work with partnerships on a variety of topic areas, from education to workforce development to health, so the Assessment is set up to provide feedback on many types of cross-sector partnerships,” Jeff told us. The topics addressed in the Assessment are broad, including many highly relevant dimensions of cross-sector collaboration, such as design and implementation, timeline, partnership structure, and specificity of objectives.

When cross-sector partners go through the Assessment together, the questions can provoke discussion on the different perceptions they have about their process or progress, helping them to identify potential challenges and emerging issues that could negatively influence the collaboration’s relationships and potential success. The productive conversations stimulated by the tool can help cross-sector partners assess how effectively they’re accounting for resources (“Each sector has a different perspective on your issue and can bring unique capacities to solving your problem,” one Assessment response explains) or if partners are successfully building a common fact base (“Do the partners assume they know the source of the problem and understand the nature of the challenge?”), among other key tactics useful for cross-sector collaboration.

The Living Cities tool not only benefits collaborators, but also those interested in cross-sector collaboration more generally, with the potential it presents for data collection on active cross-sector collaborations. With the continued convergence of cross-sector collaboration and data collection, the information collected by Living Cities will hopefully continue to inform publicly available resources and research relevant to cross-sector collaboration. “Living Cities strongly believes in open sharing of information and rapid improvement,” Jeff explained. “We hope this data will be helpful not just to us as we continue to refine the Assessment, but also to other cross-sector leaders as they think about how to best support partnerships.”

Tags:
Account for Resources, Build a Common Fact Base, Living Cities, Toolkits


Most Read
  • What makes a “good collaboration”? Eight elements for success
  • How a football stadium became a model for environmental sustainability
  • Come Home NYC connects homeless families with incomes to affordable apartments
  • Placemaking as a fulcrum for innovation
  • Supporting public sector leaders in cross-sector partnerships
RSS
Subscribe
Content we follow

The Annual Review of Social Partnerships
Aspen Institute
Bloomberg Philanthropies
Bridgespan
Concordia
FSG Blogs
GovLab
IBM Center for Business and Government
Living Cities
Strive Together
Urban Institute

Categories
  • Community Revitalization
  • Education
  • Environmental Conservation
  • Health and Wellbeing
  • Infrastructure
  • Transportation
  • Uncategorized
Intersector Video
Archives
  • August 2022
  • May 2022
  • March 2022
  • January 2022
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • June 2021
  • March 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • June 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • August 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • February 2014

logo
Contact

Washington, DC / New York City, NY
Email: tip.psi@aspeninstitute.org



SOCIAL
Privacy Policy | All Rights Reserved