SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER
Logo Logo Logo Logo Logo
  • About
    • The Intersector Project
    • Newsroom
    • Contact
  • Toolkit
  • Cases
    • Cases
  • Research
    • Research Briefing
    • Research to Practice
    • Researcher Insights
    • Reports
    • Research Agenda
    • Questions to Understand a Cross-sector Collaboration
  • Resource Library
    • About The Resource Library
    • Resource Library
    • Topic-Specific Lists of Resources
  • Blog
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linkedin
  • Vimeo
  • About
    • The Intersector Project
    • Newsroom
    • Contact
  • Toolkit
  • Cases
    • Cases
  • Research
    • Research Briefing
    • Research to Practice
    • Researcher Insights
    • Reports
    • Research Agenda
    • Questions to Understand a Cross-sector Collaboration
  • Resource Library
    • About The Resource Library
    • Resource Library
    • Topic-Specific Lists of Resources
  • Blog
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Linkedin
  • Vimeo

Apr 01 2015 First things first: Advice for engaging collaboration partners

Posted at 13:52h in Community Revitalization, Education, Environmental Conservation, Health and Wellbeing, Infrastructure by The Intersector Project

blogimage_engagingcollabAn estimated 40 percent of carbon dioxide pollution in the United States comes from energy used in homes. In Portland, Oregon, the Bureau of Planning and Sustainability wanted to provide homeowners an affordable opportunity to retrofit their homes with energy efficient upgrades, while also addressing issues of employment equity among residents and minority-owned businesses — an initiative that would require intersector collaboration across government, business, and non-profit sectors. But where to begin?

Engage Potential Partners
As a first step in cross-sector collaborations, before undertaking key diagnosis decisions such as Share a Vision of Success or Account for Resources, leaders should seek to identify and engage individuals and organizations that have a stake in the issue at hand to assess their suitability for and interest in a cross-sector partnership.

Selecting appropriate partners is crucial to ensuring that the collaboration has adequate influence and resources to meet its goals. Rather than proceeding alone or with a set of “usual” or “obvious” partners, stakeholder mapping and engagement allows potential collaborators to learn about existing networks and efforts that are tackling the same issue, as well as those (often overlooked networks and efforts) that may be impacted by partners’ efforts. This process also encourages alignment of potential partners’ interests and resources to more effectively reach the desired outcomes.

Leaders are best equipped to select suitable partners when they have a comprehensive understanding of the individuals and organizations – working in isolation or together – that are addressing issues related to the problem the collaboration aims to solve. If leaders overlook important potential partners, they may encounter external resistance to their efforts during implementation or find it hard to achieve impact at the desired scale because of a lack of support or buy-in from key stakeholders.

To avoid these pitfalls, leaders can review publicly available information such as annual reports and websites to gauge potential partners’ capacity to disseminate information; relationships with funders, government officials, or community groups; and memberships in coalitions or associations that could be leveraged in service of the collaboration’s goals. Those hoping to partner with others may also develop a network map to trace the degree of financial and nonfinancial influence a potential partner may have, as well as the strength of relationships between actors, organizations, and institutions within a network. Lastly, individuals may arrange for exploratory conversations with potential partners to gauge interest in collaborating across sectors and to convey the benefits of sharing ownership of a solution to a complex problem.

In the case of Portland, government, business, and non-profit partners came together to create Clean Energy Works Portland (CEWP), an innovative pilot program designed to provide energy upgrades to 500 Portland homes and cut energy consumption by 10 to 30 percent using an innovative financing model to eliminate steep upfront costs. The initiative began when, in 2009, the City of Portland convened nearly 50 diverse stakeholders over a series of meetings to collaboratively draft a proposal for the CEWP financing structure, which Mayor Sam Adams ultimately presented to the City Council. The meetings included a cross section of individuals from a myriad of organizations and businesses that had a stake in the program’s proposed outcomes: private utility companies, the energy sector, workers’ unions, minority-focused apprenticeship programs, associations of minority contractors, and policy program designers. Facilitated by a mediator, stakeholders also developed a Community Workforce Agreement, which now serves as the City’s equity template that promotes better hiring standards to support marginalized communities.

A first in the nation and a model for private-sector funded energy upgrades, the CEWP pilot facilitated 584 loans for whole home energy retrofits, resulting in a 20 percent or greater reduction of energy consumption in homes. Employment equity commitments provided employment for more than 400 workers, with their average wages surpassing $20/hour. Half of the hours worked were by minorities, while more than 20 percent of participating construction firms were operated by minority business owners.

Read The Intersector Project Case Study “Retrofitting Homes for Energy Efficiency in Portland.”

Tags:
Account for Resources, Toolkit, Vision of Success


Most Read
  • What makes a “good collaboration”? Eight elements for success
  • How a football stadium became a model for environmental sustainability
  • Come Home NYC connects homeless families with incomes to affordable apartments
  • Placemaking as a fulcrum for innovation
  • Supporting public sector leaders in cross-sector partnerships
RSS
Subscribe
Content we follow

The Annual Review of Social Partnerships
Aspen Institute
Bloomberg Philanthropies
Bridgespan
Concordia
FSG Blogs
GovLab
IBM Center for Business and Government
Living Cities
Strive Together
Urban Institute

Categories
  • Community Revitalization
  • Education
  • Environmental Conservation
  • Health and Wellbeing
  • Infrastructure
  • Transportation
  • Uncategorized
Intersector Video
Archives
  • August 2022
  • May 2022
  • March 2022
  • January 2022
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • June 2021
  • March 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • June 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • August 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • February 2014

logo
Contact

Washington, DC / New York City, NY
Email: tip.psi@aspeninstitute.org



SOCIAL
Privacy Policy | All Rights Reserved